Friday 25th of July 2008 11:32:35 PM  GMT+2 
 

 
Revitalizing Turkish-US strategic ties depends on solving some sticky issues

ILNUR CEVIK The New Anatolian / Ankara
19 September 2007

Font Size: default  medium  large 

U.S. Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs Nicholas Burns will hold talks with Turkish leaders today to seek ways to "revitalize" the strategic relationship between Ankara and Washington.

The no.3 official of the State Department arrived in Istanbul Monday night and has spent Tuesday in Istanbul. He flew to Ankara later Tuesday.

In Istanbul Burns met with members of the Parliament during an iftar, and with religious leaders, students, and civil society activists.

The U.S. State Department has said Burns will discuss a range of strategic issues with the new Turkish government and reaffirm the great importance the U.S. attaches to its alliance with Turkey.

This will be the first in a series of high-level meetings between the United States and the new Turkish government that will take place this autumn, stated the Department.

In Ankara, Burns will meet with Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and senior members of the Foreign Ministry and Parliament.

Burns has already given hints about the issues to be taken up with Turkish leaders during his address to the Atlantic Council of the United States in Washington last week.

Iraq is a sticky issue between Turkey and the U.S. While Americans are happy to see Turkish efforts to keep Iraq intact Ankara is now questioning America's future plans about the Kurds of Iraq.

The Kurdish puzzle -----------------------------ARA BASLIK

Ankara is angered with the presence of the PKK terrorists in the northern mountains of Iraq in areas controlled by the autonomous Kurdish administration. PKK terrorists use the area to launch terrorist attacks into Turkey. Ankara says the Americans have not been able to help to convince the Iraqi Kurds not to allow the PKK to feel at home in the northern provinces.

Some circles in Ankara see growing American favoritism towards the Kurdish administration in Erbil that governs the northern provinces. There are signs that the U.S. may turn a blind eye to Kurdish independence. Ankara is against Kurdish independence as it fears this could encourage secessionism among Turkey's Kurds living in the neighboring region of southeastern Turkey.

Earlier this month, the Kurdish Regional Government (KRG) announced that it had signed a production-sharing deal with Texas-based Hunt Oil. The move is an indication that Western oil companies, frustrated over the delay in the passage of a national oil law by the Iraqi government, are moving to make deals with regional bodies to get access to Iraq's vast oil reserves.

As significant as the deal itself is the identity of the company involved. Ray Hunt, the CEO and president of privately held Hunt Oil, is a close confidant of President Bush and a prominent figure in the US political and intelligence establishment.

To what extent the policy of the Bush administration is motivating the deal-and to what extent it is motivated by purely profit interests-cannot be determined. However, the announcement comes at a time of growing strains between the Iraqi federal government, led by Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, and the Bush administration. Many commentators have noted that the moves by Kurdish authorities to establish autonomy in the control of the region's oil resources could contribute to a fracturing of the Iraqi state along sectarian lines.

Hussain al-Shahristani, the Iraqi oil minister in the Maliki cabinet, denounced the agreement, saying, "Any oil deal has no standing as far as the government of Iraq is concerned. All these contracts have to be approved by the Federal Authority before they are legal. This [contract] was not presented for approval. It has no standing."

Turkey wants to know if Washington will sacrifice its strategic relations with Ankara for an independent Kurdish state. This will be one of the vital questions that Turks will seek an answer when Burns talks to Turkish officials and in the other high level meetings between the two countries.

What to do with Iran? ---------------------- ARA BASLIK

The other sticky issue that Ankara and Washington have to resolve is what to do with Iran. The Americans are visibly annoyed with Turkey's growing relations with the Iranians. Turkey and Iran have recently signed a major energy deal where Turkey will develop the rich Iranian natural gas fields and also build a pipeline to sell Iranian gas to Europe.

The U.S. feels as long as Iran does not abandon its nuclear program it will remain a major "target."
Recent events where Israelis allegedly made trial runs over Syria to hit Iranian nuclear facilities with allegedly the blessing of Washington and other statements coming out of the U.S. suggest that the Americans are considering a military option against Iran.

Burns has told the Atlantic Council that in this area while U.S. appreciates Turkey's diplomatic efforts to tame Iran there is a difference of opinion on how to handle the Tehran file.

Burns said "the United States and Turkey still need to work out some tactical differences in handling Iran. We understand that Iran is a neighbor of Turkey and key trading partner, which sends over a million tourists to Turkey each year. Turkey's recent conclusion of a memorandum on energy cooperation with Iran, however, is troubling. Now is not the time for business as usual with Iran. We urge all of our friends and allies, including Turkey, to not reward Iran by investing in its oil and gas sector, while Iran continues to defy the United Nations Security Council by continuing its nuclear research for a weapons capability."

Other sticky issues --------------------------- ARA BASLIK

Turkeys feels it has to face the realities in Cyprus and seek a solution that will also eliminate some of the serious obstacles for its European Union membership.

The Greek Cypriots who are a member of the EU have been effectively blocking Turkey's accession process.

Turkey has to open its ports and airfields to the Greek Cypriots, a move that would create havoc for the Erdogan government at home.

Turkish and Greek Cypriot leaders have met to revive the July 8, 2006 process but the impasse continues.

The U.S. has moved to help the Turkish Cypriots and ease their international isolation while the EU has been reluctant to follow course. Ankara expects the Americans to put pressure on the Greek Cypriots to be more facilitating.

A strong Greek Cypriot lobby is making life difficult for Turkey in Washington. But that is the least of Ankara's worries. There is even a stronger lobby in Washington that is seriously threatening
Turkish-American ties: The Armenians.

A move by the Armenians to legislate a congressional bill that will recognize the acts of 1915 as genocide committed by the Ottoman Turks against Armenians is pending. Turks are up in arms and the American administration has told the U.S. Congress such moves will seriously bilateral relations.

But it is clear that the U.S. administration is really tired of having to contain a fire that erupts every April with the Armenians pushing for revenge and the Turks threatening the U.S. with serious damage to ties.
Americans say Turkey should open its borders with Armenia is a move to reconciliation. But Turks feel such a move will not blunt the antagonism of the Armenian diasporas in northern America and Europe that are calling for revenge.

Turkey and the U.S. also do not see eye to eye over the reek Orthodox Church in Istanbul. The Americans regard the church as ecumenical while Turkey says it is only a regional church.

On the Middle East Turkey sees a major danger of new conflicts in the Middle East if Iraq is allowed to collapse. Turkey sees the danger of a major confrontation between the Iran inspired Shiites of the region and the Sunni Arab axis formed by Iraqi Arabs, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, Yemen, Syria and Gulf Arabs.

Turks feel they can help in the Middle East peace process with their special relationship with Israel and their close contacts with Syria and the Palestinians. But Turks feel the confrontation between Shiites and the Arab axis could be a nightmare.

Americans also have to understand that the Arabs reject the Turkish version of moderate Islam where a party with Islamic roots can support secularism and modernization. So while Turkey remains a unique Islamic model that can blend into the western civilization there are clear indications that this model will not be adopted by the Arabs.

Turkish and American leaders will have to address these issues as they set the stage for rejuvenating the strategic relationship.


Go Back

TNA ARTICLES 
The right of free communications does not exist in Turkey

The widespread eavesdropping cases that are being reveled in Turkey everyday shows there is a serious problem that has to be addressed b y the government and the state institutions. This does not fit a country that aims to join the European Union.

Ilnur Cevik
 


TNA SUPPLEMENTS
            

© 2005-2007 The New Anatolian - All rights reserved